- Members are gathered into small tightly
knit groups under a "shepherd" or designated "spiritual leader."
(Creates cloning effect)
- This group is part of a larger congress
or movement, which has strong central leadership, normally with one very
predominate man or woman at its head. (Often with a guise of plurality
of leadership)
- Book, tapes, publishers and the like are
normally limited to only a few very central people, primarily the key
leader. (In other words, only the centralized leaders, or the
predominate leader are allowed to write or circulate "approved" material
within the group.) While some other lesser members may attempt to write,
their material is not likely to receive wide distribution or acceptance
without clear-cut approval from the centralized leadership.
- There tends to be an intense or high
level of control of the shepherds over the sheep. The shepherds' advice
and/or approval is thought necessary, or very strongly urged in a number
of normally personal areas, such as dating, marriage, housing, jobs,
education, career, relocating to another city, etc. (This level of
control is often strengthened by the practice of communal style living.
By having several group members living in one household, the shepherds
gain leverage in the home environment, and are able to influence such
personal areas as eating, sleeping, reading, hygiene, purchasing of
personal or "luxury" items, etc.)
- Mundane activities tend
to be determined and directed by the leaders rather than by doctrine.
- Shepherds, or their
designates, tend to see the "sheep" several times a week.
- There is a great deal of
pressure upon the individual to live up to or to conform to group
criteria above and beyond what can be clearly seen as biblical criteria.
- To question a shepherd's
teaching or conduct is considered as questioning God, particularly if
the shepherd has already defended himself against questioning on that
point of teaching or conduct. To continue to question or challenge will
likely result in "marking," "shunning," or "excommunication."
- Submission/obedience to
authority is a heavily emphasized doctrine.
- Guilt by association is
generally accepted, in that if someone is known to have had contact with
a dissenter or "marked" person, that one then is considered to have been
contaminated or "poisoned."
- There is no
accountability of the group to the wider Body of Christ The group
vigorously avoids any efforts to have their doctrine or methods, or even
specific instances, examined objectively by outside Christian leaders or
theologians. Financial and business records are not made available for
public scrutiny.
- The group is
often an independent church or "fellowship" which has broken off from a
mainline denomination or otherwise generally
accepted
Christian association.
- There tends to be a
monotonous repetition of certain doctrinal themes or the group's
"positions," which is observed in the group's teachings, tapes and
literature. Systematic theology is rarely, if ever, taught, and true
expositional type teaching is rarely, if ever, heard.
- There is an emphasis,
either implicitly or explicitly stated that this particular group is
"special." "We are God's assemblies." "We are the true expression of the
church." "We are not the only group, but we are a very special group in
God's eyes." "Eventually, all Christians will do what we're doing, or
else we will be persecuted by other Christians."
- Unity with the "church"
is heavily stressed, usually to the point where it becomes the chief
doctrine of the group. Unity is considered to be more important than
"doctrine," yet the group cites its own pet doctrines as the reason why
they had to leave their parent organization or why they cannot work more
closely with other Christians, or why their members should remain with
them rather than join another group.
- There tends to be an
alienation from, or antagonism towards, other sources of information,
such as families, churches, authors, etc., especially if these other
sources challenge or question the pet doctrine of the group.
- The defensive mentality
of the group is so pronounced as to actually be institutionalized.
Elaborate, mechanisms and doctrines are in place to tell the members how
to cope with criticism of the group. This defensiveness has far more to
do with defending the group or its leaders, than it does with defending
the Faith "once for all delivered to the saints.
Questions to ask yourself:
- Have you ever had a Christian leader
imply that you were either rebellious or disobedient to God because you
didn't take their advice?
- Have you ever had a Christian leader
tell you that you had an evil spirit or a spirit of rebellion simply
because you asked questions?
- Have you ever challenged a leader and
they saw this as an assault on their authority?
- Have you ever felt that a leader (or
leaders) was (were) lording it over you?
- Does it ever bother you when a
Christian group, community, or Bible study all look, act and talk alike?
- Has another Christian ever told you
that they were your shepherd?
If any of these questions ignite a
positive response in you, you may be involved in an aberrant and
potentially destructive relationship or group.
The New Testament gives us some basic
guidelines to protect us from getting involved in relationships which are
destructive both emotionally and spiritually.
~Excerpted from an outline by Harold Bussell, author of Unholy Devotion.
Back to Articles on Understanding
Mind Control and Exploitive Groups
Contents (Site Map)
Home |